Legal Opinion
Marvel Specialty Co. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided April 22, 1963No. Civ. No. 1863PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, Chief Judge.
Apparatus for mending hosiery is the subject of the disputed patent in this case. Simultaneously with the filing of this opinion, the court has filed detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Briefly summarized, this is a controversy involving validity and infringement of Brown Patent No. 2,570,637 entitled “Method of and Apparatus for Mending Hosiery” issued October 9, 1951. Plaintiff is the owner of the Brown patent and has been since its issuance. Defendant is accused of infringing the Brown patent by the use of ■certain mending devices purchased from Stanford…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- United States v. 25.406 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Entron on Maryland, Inc. v. Jerrold Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marvel Specialty Company, Inc. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc., and Stanford Marley Distributing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Marvel Specialty Co. v. Bell Hosiery Mills, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1964