Legal Opinion
Skanska Tunneling, Inc. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 26, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered June 25, 1997, which, in an action seeking to recover increased costs under the changed conditions provisions of a municipal contract, upon the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, inter alia, declared in defendant City’s favor that the dispute resolution procedures set forth in 9 RCNY 7-05, incorporated into the contract, are not illegal and that plaintiff contractor’s changed conditions claim is subject to such dispute resolution procedures, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Dispute resolution procedures like…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maross Construction, Inc. v. Central New York Regional Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Yonkers Contracting Co., Inc. v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- Laquila Construction, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Weeks Marine Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Greenwald v. WeisbaumNew York Supreme Court · 2004