Legal Opinion
Greenwald v. Weisbaum
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Fried, J.
Motion sequence Nos. 001 and 002 are combined for disposition.
Plaintiff Greenwald instituted this action complaining of his and other purported class members1 wrongful termination from the defendant partnership, BDO Seidman, LLP2 At issue is the validity and enforceability of an arbitration agreement contained in provision 14.8 of a partnership agreement that plaintiff and BDO entered into. On the one hand, defendants contend that the dispute arising from plaintiffs alleged wrongful termination must be referred to arbitration in accordance with the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re the Arbitration between Cross & Brown Co. & NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Hottle v. BDO Seidman, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BDO Seidman, LLP v. BeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Clinton v. OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011