Legal Opinion

Jackson County v. City of Jackson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 2013No. Docket Nos. 307685 and 307843PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs commenced these original actions in the Court of Appeals under Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25-34, popularly known as the Headlee Amendment. The actions were consolidated by the Court of Appeals. The Jackson City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2011.02, pursuant to which the city created a storm water utility and imposed a storm water management charge on all property owners within the city to generate revenue to pay for the services provided by the utility, which include, among others, street sweeping, catch basin cleaning, and leaf pickup and mulching. The question posed by these actions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bolt v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trahey v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Deerhurst Condominium Owners Association Inc v. City of WestlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Indian River Trading Post v. Township of TuscaroraMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Indian River Trading Post v. Township of TuscaroraMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. James P Page v. City of WyandotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API