Legal Opinion
Pace Industries, Inc. v. Three Phoenix Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 1987No. 85-1754PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Pace Industries, Inc. (“Pace”) appeals from a grant of summary judgment for Three Phoenix Co. (“Three Phoenix”), Donald Oglesby (“Oglesby”) and Beverly Oglesby, and Wabash Computer Corporation (“Wabash”) on Pace’s antitrust action for treble damages under 15 U.S.C. § 15. The district court held that the action was barred by the four-year statute of limitations. We affirm.
PACTS
Appellee Wabash manufactured and sold two lines of disc testing equipment: single disc testers and multiple disc testers. In 1973, Wabash sold its single disc tester line to appellee Three Phoenix,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Korody-Colyer Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Nakamoto v. HartleyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
- Astoria Entertainment, Inc. v. EdwardsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.