Legal Opinion

Nakamoto v. Hartley

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided March 1, 1991No. Civ. 90-00828 DAEPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANT GOLDMAN’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

DAVID A. EZRA, District Judge.

The motion to dismiss of defendants Michael J. Roberts (“Roberts”) and Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand (“VLBMH”), and the motion to continue trial of defendants Martin F. Goldman, the individual, and Martin F. Goldman, a Professional Corporation (collectively “Goldman”), came on for hearing before this court on February 25, 1991. William B. Hirsch, Esq. and Louise K.Y. Ing, Esq. appeared for plaintiffs Gary and Susan…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Turoso v. Cleveland Municipal CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & SeidmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lui Ciro, Inc. v. Ciro, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
  2. Lowther v. U.S. Bank N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
  3. Television Events & Marketing, Inc. v. AMCON Distributing Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
  4. Wood v. Greenberry Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  5. Molina v. Onewest Bank, FSHDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API