Legal Opinion

Black v. Harman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 1923No. 11381PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary:

The following statement appears in the record:

“This is an action against the defendant, Harriet F. Harman, the mother of the plaintiff, for an accounting of the rents' and profits of certain lands described in the complaint, which lands had been devised to the defendant by her father, Frederick H. Dominick, in the year 1891. The plaintiff claims ‘that under the terms of the devise she has a vested interest in the income from the said lands to the extent of one-tenth thereof, the said income being subject to equal distribution…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hancock v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Walker v. AlversonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Rutledge v. FishburneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Cain v. CainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  5. Brantley v. BittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Piegler. v. JeffriesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  3. Rollins v. MayDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1978
  4. United States v. 15,883.55 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1942
  5. Des Champs v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API