Legal Opinion

Korab v. Fink

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 1, 2014No. 11-15132PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Concurrence by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge CLIFTON.

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This case presents yet another challenge to the complex area of state-funded benefits for aliens. In enacting comprehensive welfare reform in 1996, Congress rendered various groups of aliens ineligible for federal benefits and also restricted states’ ability to use their own funds to provide benefits to certain aliens. See 8 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq. As a condition of receiving federal funds, Congress required states to limit eligibility for federal benefits, such as Medicaid, to citizens…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Alberto Mendez-Garcia v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Melvyn GearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Kuang v. U.S. Dep't of Def.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. Purushothaman Rajaram v. Meta Platforms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API