Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Shelton
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 7, 2001No. 1990366PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
We are now addressing Mae Clark's1 second petition to this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Etowah County Circuit Court to vacate its order compelling her to arbitrate her claims against Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama ("Blue Cross"). See Ex parte Shelton,738 So.2d 864 (Ala. 1999) ("Shelton I"). In Shelton I, this Court denied the petition of Shelton and Clark for a writ of mandamus because the materials submitted in support of the first petition did not warrant relief.
Operative Facts Common to Shelton I and This Case ("Shelton II")
In 1991, Clark applied to Blue Cross for a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- AG Edwards & Sons, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eb Investments v. Atlantis DevelopmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Miller Dollarhide, P.C. v. TalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Boudreaux v. PettawaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Schillaci v. Gentry (Ex parte Gentry)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Jadick v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.