Legal Opinion

Hillhouse v. Hillhouse

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 19, 1930No. 6 Div. 653PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The petition is for mandamus to require the circuit- judge “to dismiss” a pending cause “for non-payment of costs” within ten days, or that he'be “directed to set aside, annul, and vacate any orders or decrees rendered since the taking of the appeal,” etc.

The documents exhibited were: Nina May Lawson Hillhouse’s original bill for annulment of her marriage with petitioner, No. 27759; her bill for divorce thereafter filed, No. 28212; motion of respondent on the ground that former bill was dismissed without payment of costs, and that same be required; objections to the ascertainment and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kinney v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. TissierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Manning v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Ex parte CuddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Ex Parte AppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Byrum Hardware Co. v. Jenkins Bldg. Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Ex Parte TalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. CummingsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API