Legal Opinion
Getty v. Getty
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 1988No. B025524PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ORTEGA, J.
Facts
Respondents Caroline Getty, Anne Getty Earhart, and Claire E. Getty, are daughters of George F. Getty II, the deceased son of J. Paul Getty. They are the current income and presumptive remainder beneficiaries under the Declaration of Trust of Sarah Getty. Appellant Gordon P. Getty, the son of J. Paul Getty, is a trustee of the estate and an income beneficiary. The other appellants, children of Gordon P. Getty, are contingent beneficiaries under the declaration of trust.
The trust, created in 1934 by J. Paul Getty and his mother Sarah C. Getty, was created “. . . to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Kenna EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Adams v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Copley v. CopleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Ellena v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Saks v. Damon Raike & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Schwartz v. LabowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Pressman-Gutman Co., Inc. Employer/sponsor of the Pressman-Gutman Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, in 05-1012 Pressman-Gutman Co., Employer/sponsor of the Pressman-Gutman Co., Inc. Profit Sharing Plan, in 05-1026 v. First Union National Bank Forefront Capital Advisors, LLC Alvin P. Gutman James C. Gutman Alvin P. Gutman James C. Gutman, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- In Re Estate of KlarnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pressman-Gutman Co. v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.