Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brown v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 15, 1989No. B034098PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting the motion of defendants James Watson, Bray & Watson and Clifford Gorman to quash service of summons for lack of jurisdiction and dismissing plaintiffs’ actions as to said defendants.

Facts

James Brown and Sarah Crummie brought a legal malpractice action against two groups of defendants: Harold Gamer, James Tipps and Gamer & Tipps, residents of California licensed to practice law in that state and a California law corporation, respectively (California attorneys); and J. Monte Bray, James Watson, Clifford Gorman and Bray & Watson,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Cornelison v. ChaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Newsome v. GallacherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. Sher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & EmlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Magnecomp Corp. v. Athene Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API