Legal Opinion
United States v. Feliciano
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 17, 2017No. 17-0035/ARPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Challenging his twin convictions for attempted sexual assault, Appellant alleges two instructional errors. First, he argues that the military judge inappropriately failed to instruct panel members on the voluntary abandonment defense. Second, Appellant contends that the military judge misstated the parameters of the mistake of fact as to consent defense in his instructions to members. We conclude that the military judge did not err by not instructing members on voluntary abandonment, since there was no evidence supporting this affirmative…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. GladueCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. ByrdUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. KnappCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. BungertCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- U.S. V.WILEYNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. GuardadoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. GuardadoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. Private E1 CALEB J. HOLMESArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. RichUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.