Legal Opinion
United States v. Gladue
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided April 28, 2009No. 08-0452/AFPublishedCited by 155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to determine whether Appellant’s pretrial agreement (PTA) to “waive any waiveable [sic] motions” barred Appellant from asserting claims of multiplicity or multiplication of charges on appeal. We find that under these facts it did, and affirm.
This case began when Appellant brought a firearm onto Robins Air Force Base in violation of Base Instruction 31-101. Upset with the treatment he had received from two of his supervising noncommissioned officers, Appellant communicated to friend and coworker Staff Sergeant Jeremy Green…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. QuirozCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Carr v. SaulSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- United States v. AhernCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. ChinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.