Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNGERT, J.

The judgment setting aside the commission’s order must be affirmed.

We consider that on the undisputed facts, and on the finding of the commission on the one material point of fact in dispute, only one inference is permissible, viz., that Chamberlain sustained his injury while performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment, and the accident arose out of his employment. Therefore only a question of law is presented, and we are not bound by the commission’s determination to the contrary, whether it be treated as a finding of fact or a conclusion of law. Schmidlkofer v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Town of Presque Isle v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Fawcett v. GalleryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Price v. Shorewood Motors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Horvath v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Black River Dairy Products, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API