Legal Opinion

McGinty v. Dennehy

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1929No. 1165-5140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.

The ease originated in the county court. Jurisdiction in the Supreme Court depends upon existence of some exceptional condition named in article 1821, R. S. 1925. Such a condition is pleaded in the petition in error in asserted conflict of decision in the present case with decisions in Morrison v. Barry, 10 Tex. Civ. App. 22, 30 S. W. 376 (writ denied); Hoeldtke v. Horstmann, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 148, 128 S. W. 642; Hill v. Hoeldkte, 104 Tex. 594, 142 S. W. 871, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 672, affirming judgment in Hoeldkte v. Horstmann; Green v. Gregory (Tex. Civ. App.) 142 S. W. 999; Allen v. Traylor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. HoeldtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Garitty v. RaineyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brannin v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. HindsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Edwards v. BealsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. BaileyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Key v. Alamo Nat. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Oppenheimer v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API