Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 26, 2007No. Nos. 00-292C, 01-434CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR VACATUR
FIRESTONE, Judge.
At issue before the court is the United States’ (“government” or “defendant”) unopposed motion for vacatur of the court’s opinion (“2002 Opinion” or “Opinion”) reported at Sweet v. United States, 53 Fed.Cl. 208 (2002). The government initially filed its motion on September 12, 2006, contending that the 2002 Opinion was based upon facts and/or events that had subsequently changed, and additionally that the case and controversy between the parties had become moot. On September 25, 2006, the court issued an order staying…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. Bernard Jerry, and Edgar SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc. And Dan JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Ware ex rel. Boyer v. Hospital of the UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ambase Corporation and Carteret Bancorp, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Doherty v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020