Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 1, 2020No. 15-1429Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: May 7, 2020 * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED KATHERINE DOHERTY, * * No. 15-1429V Petitioner, * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Interim Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Non-Compensable Legal Research; * Paralegal Tasks; Reduction of Expert Respondent. * Costs. * * * * * * * * * * * Joseph L. Doherty, Jr., The Doherty Law Firm, Woburn, MA, for petitioner. Althea C. Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. DECISION ON INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1 On…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API