Legal Opinion
Queen v. Schultz
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 30, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0871PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
This case concerns the nature of the relationship between two parties involved in the formation of “The Ed Show” — a political news commentary television program hosted by the defendant, Ed Schultz, on MSNBC. The plaintiff, Michael Queen, 1 claims that he was left out of the show when it was brought to air on MSNBC, and as a result he brings five causes of action against the defendant: breach of contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, fraud in the inducement, tortious interference with a business relationship, and intentional infliction…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Michael Queen v. Ed SchultzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Queen v. SchultzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- McNamara v. PickenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jackson v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Queen v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016