Queen v. Schultz
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and briefed and argued by counsel. The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 36(d). For the reasons stated below, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the District Court’s May 18, 2015 judgment and August 5, 2015 order be affirmed.
In January 2008, NBC cameraman Michael Queen met Ed Schultz in the hallways of NBC after ’ Schultz had finished taping a guest appearance on the television program…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- United States v. Morris FahnbullehCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Reed, VincentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Jo v. JPMC Specialty Mortg., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Gay v. KijakaziDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Thomas v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025