Legal Opinion

People v. Rosenburg

New York County Courts

Decided July 3, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSobel, J.

The defendant, Rosenburg, has been indicted for perjury. The accusation arose out of testimony given by him in another grand jury proceeding. In that proceeding Rosenburg testified that his employees, Brown and Collington, received certain wages during a stated period. As a result of his testi*23mony these employees were indicted for grand larceny in connection with supplemental relief grants they received from the city welfare authorities.

The indictments against the employees, Brown and Collington, have not been brought to trial. The District Attorney after investigation determined to proceed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. PaleseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. SeaveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. People v. GroutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. People v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. FitzpatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. People v. VelellaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1961
  3. People v. Wright, New York County Courts1961
  4. People v. LiebermanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API