Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 17, 2016No. CV 11-02409 SJO (JEMx)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF UNPATENTABILITY [Docket No. 524]

THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants/Counterclaimants WebEx Communications, Inc., Cisco WebEx LLC, and Cisco Systems, Inc. (together, “Cisco”), Citrix Online, LLC and Citrix Systems, Inc. (together, “Citrix”), and Microsoft Corp.’s (“Microsoft”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment of Unpatentability Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (“Motion”), filed on October 20, 2015. Plaintiff Richard A.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Techs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API