Legal Opinion
Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Techs., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 13, 2019No. Case No. 18-CV-03685-LHKPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Dropbox, Inc. filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant infringes claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,058,399 ("the '399 Patent") and U.S. Patent No. 6,178,505 ("the '505 Patent") (collectively, the "patents-in-suit"). Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss, which contends that the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit fail to recite patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. ECF No. 57. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020