Legal Opinion

People v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress his showup identification. We disagree. The detention and transportation of defendant by the police to the scene of the reported burglary for the purpose of viewing by a witness did not, under the circumstances of this case, constitute a de facto arrest. Defendant *927was stopped a short distance from the burglary scene at approximately 3:20 a.m. while he was walking alone down the side of the road. In stopping defendant and transporting him to the scene, the police used no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. LinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. People v. DavisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API