Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1989PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in that court’s memorandum (138 AD2d 972).

We would only add that defendant failed to timely raise the issue of whether he was properly sentenced as a second felony offender by not controverting the allegations in the *963predicate felony statement (CPL 400.21 [3]). Accordingly, any question concerning whether defendant’s prior conviction of kidnapping under 18 USC § 1201 is equivalent to his conviction of a felony in New York has not been preserved for our review.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. The People v. Mark JurginsNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. LeszczynskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API