Legal Opinion
Walters v. Cox
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 25, 2004No. 2:04-cv-73367PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OCTOBER Jh 2001 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
STEEH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Donald Walters, a state prisoner, filed a pro se complaint on August 30, 2004 against Michigan Attorney General Michael Cox, Eaton County, Michigan, Circuit Court Judge Calvin Osterhaven, and the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) alleging the defendants unlawfully seized his pension benefits under Michigan’s State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act (“SCFRA”), M.C.L. § 800.401 et seq., which authorizes the Michigan Treasurer to seek…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Mike CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006