Legal Opinion
Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Mike Cox
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 23, 2006No. 05-1716Published
1Opinion of the Court
447 F.3d 967
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and DaimlerChrysler-UAW Pension Agreement, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Mike COX, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, and Jay B. Rising, Treasurer of the State of Michigan, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 05-1716.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued: April 27, 2006.
Decided and Filed: May 23, 2006.
ARGUED: Victoria A. Reardon, State of Michigan, Department of the Attorney General, Detroit, Michigan, for Appellants. Edward C. Hammond, Clark Hill, Birmingham, Michigan, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Victoria A. Reardon, Daniel M. Levy, State of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.