Legal Opinion
Nycal Offshore Development Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 9, 2010No. 05-249CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*211 OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a contract action brought by a part owner of two government-issued offshore oil and gas leases. In this and a related action, we previously held that the government committed a total breach of the lease contracts. See Amber Resources v. United States, 68 Fed.Cl. 535 (2005) (“Amber I”). Co-owners of the leases sought restitution in lieu of lost profits and recovered. See Amber Resources v. United States, 73 Fed.Cl. 738 (2006) (“Amber II”); Amber Resources v. United States, No. 02-30 (Fed.Cl. Jan.11, 2007) (order for Rule 54(b) Judgment). The plaintiff here,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- First Nationwide Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Amber Resources Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Amber Resources Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Amber Resources Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nycal Offshore Development Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Nycal Offshore Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010