Legal Opinion
Nycal Offshore Development Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 31, 2012No. 05-249CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Plaintiff, Nycal Offshore Development Corporation (“Nycal”), is a partial interest holder in two oil and gas leases, the terms of which we held earlier were breached when the United States materially changed the statutory and regulatory scheme under which development of the leases was to take place. Breach having been established, plaintiff proceeded to trial, seeking to recover the profits it believes it would have recouped absent the breach. Trial was held November 30 through December 10, 2011, in Santa Barbara, California and December 15 and 16, 2011, in Washington,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Landmark Land Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nycal Offshore Development Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Nycal Offshore Development Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020