Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Boatright
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Townsend, Judge.
1. “A second insurance on the same property, unless by consent of the insurer, will void the policy.” Code § 56-830. “The taking out of additional insurance on the same property, unless by consent of the insurer, renders the policy void as to the insured.” American Ins. Co. v. Hattaway, 194 Ga. 15 (2) (20 S. E. 2d 406); Northwestern Fire &c. Ins. Co. v. Peek, 89 Ga. App. 105 (78 S. E. 2d 879). Further, where there is an express provision in the policy that the same should become void in the event the insured should thereafter, without first procuring the company’s written…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- City Fire Insurance v. CarrugiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
- Lippman v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Swain v. Macon Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boston Insurance Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- American International Life Insurance v. HartsfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- South Carolina Insurance v. HunnicuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Schroeder v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Schroeder v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.