Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Schroeder v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1993No. A93A1075Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBlackburn, Judge

I agree with the majority that the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment to Farm Bureau on the issue of its liability for bad faith penalties. As Farm Bureau’s defenses raised reasonable questions of law, an award for damages and attorney fees for bad faith was not authorized. Colonial Life &c. Ins. Co. v. McClain, 243 Ga. 263 (253 SE2d 745) (1979).

With regard to the coverage provided under the insurance contract, I dissent from the majority and find that the insurance contract was not voided by the Schroeders’ actions.

Section I, Coverage “A” of the subject policy provides in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. McClainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. American International Life Insurance v. HartsfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Blackburn v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API