Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Kane

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1939No. Civ. 10898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

J.—The petitioner has appealed from a judgment denying him a writ of mandate. His application for a writ was based on his claim that the defendant, as auditor, should have drawn a warrant in his favor for a full month’s salary as purchasing agent of San Mateo County for the month of December, 1937. The defendant answered that the office of purchasing agent had been consolidated with the office of county executive and the tenure of the petitioner had been terminated. The appeal presents therefore solely a question of law.

Heretofore San Mateo County was organized under a charter. (Stats. 1933,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Jacksonville v. SmootSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  2. Rogers v. Calumet National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People ex rel. Rynerson v. KelseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Booth v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. City of Wyandotte v. DrennanMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Anderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Anderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Anderson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Gem State Academy BakeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API