Legal Opinion

Piasecki v. Fidelity Corp. of Mich.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1954No. Docket 32, Calendar 46,020PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiffs in this jury case seek to recover damages arising from deterioration in value of a chattel mortgage assigned with guaranty by plaintiffs to defendant, occasioned by defendant’s failure to carry out its duty to plaintiffs to file the chattel mortgage with the register of deeds for Muskegon county promptly and seasonably, by which failure interim creditors of the later bankrupt chattel mortgagor were allowed to advance credit, in ignorance of the existence of the chattel mortgage.

Plaintiffs claim that at the time the chattel mortgage was assigned to defendant with a guaranty as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bedford v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Mathews v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Lamb v. StoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hopkins v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Wisconsin Marine & Fire Insurance v. Manistee Salt & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Scott-Douglas Corp. v. Greyhound Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. Michigan Sugar Co. v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL LIABILITY INS. CO. OF WI.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Union Investment Company v. Fidelity & Deposit Company Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. Comerica Bank v. CohenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API