Legal Opinion

Emmis Broadcasting Corp. v. Borough of East Rutherford

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 23, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a decision of the Tax Court valuing plaintiffs’ property for real property taxes for the years 1991 through 1994. Defendant contends that the judge (1) erred in certain factual findings; (2) should have assessed the property at its highest and best use; and (3) should not have held that certain radio towers were non-taxable.

After a thorough review of the record, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Small in his comprehensive written opinion of March 21,1995.

I

The property consists of 22.58 acres and is located in a corner of the Sports Complex Zone…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. GLENPOINTE ASS'N. v. Tp. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  3. Hackensack Water Company v. Borough of Old TappanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Ferraro v. DemetrakisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  5. In re Certification of Need Issued To Bloomingdale Convalescent CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Howell Township v. Monmouth County Board of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1999
  3. General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenNew Jersey Tax Court · 2002
  4. Pepperidge Tree Realty Corp. v. Kinnelon BoroughNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003
  5. Shaw v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API