Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. City of Linden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 21, 1997PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

In this case, we review again the ebb and flow of legislative and judicial efforts to distinguish between real and personal property for purposes of taxation. We last reviewed that distinction in R.C. Maxwell Co. v. Galloway Township, 145 N.J. 547, 679 A.2d 141 (1996). This appeal presents a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the Business Retention Act of 1992(BRA). L. 1992, c. 24, §§ 1 to 7. We find that the statute is facially constitutional because it may reasonably be interpreted as not to create an unconstitutional exemption…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hills Dev. Co. v. Bernards Tp. in Somerset Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Phillips v. CurialeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. One 1990 Honda AccordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Brown v. Township of Old BridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. DIR., DIV. OF TAX.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. In re Contest of November 8, 2011 General Election of Office of New Jersey General AssemblySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  5. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API