Legal Opinion
Barefoot v. City of Wilmington
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 10, 2002No. Nos. 01-1185, 01-2191PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge LUTTIG joined.
OPINION
GREGORY, Circuit Judge.
The Appellants challenge the City of Wilmington’s decision to annex territory on which they reside. They assert that the annexation violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV. We hold that Wilmington’s actions did not violate any of these provisions of the United States Constitution.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Mozafar H. Davani v. Virginia Department of Transportation Steven E. Welch William v. Johnson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Green v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Evandro S. Santini and Santini Homes, Inc. v. Connecticut Hazardous Waste Management ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Scott v. Town of MonroeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Jocham v. Tuscola CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.