Legal Opinion

Christie v. Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 23

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 6, 1958No. 3563PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a suit instituted by Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 23, as plaintiff, for recovery of $9,750 paid to B. V. Christie & Company for services allegedly rendered as fiscal agent of the District, and for $9,750 paid to W. L. Norman as a broker’s fee for allegedly selling certain bonds for the District.

Motions by the defendants in the nature of pleas in abatement were made, attacking the plaintiff’s capacity to maintain suit as a corporation and contending that the City of Plouston was the proper party plaintiff. Such pleas were overruled. Trial was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Payne v. First Nat. Bank of ColumbusTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FilmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Forbes v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Deming v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Davis v. Texas Boiler & MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mercure Co., NV v. Rowland, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  3. Norman v. B. v. Christie & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Pereira v. Gulf Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Tapiador v. North American Lloyds of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API