Legal Opinion
Fagan v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 2003No. A102525PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
By petition for writ of mandate, Alex Fagan, Jr., Matthew Tonsing and David Lee challenge an order of the San Francisco Superior Court denying their motion to maintain under seal the results of urinalysis tests. The urinalysis results are contained in petitioners’ confidential peace officer personnel files (Pen. Code, § 832.8), 1 but were obtained by the San Francisco District Attorney pursuant to section 832.7, subdivision (a). Petitioners contend that the district attorney was not authorized to obtain the results and, even if the district attorney was so authorized, the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. MoocCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pasadena Police Officers Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- City of Woodlake v. Tulare County Grand JuryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- Spielbauer v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Towner v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021