Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. Halverson
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 15, 2006No. 05-CV-1299 (JMR/FLN)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff claims defendants, Adam M. Hal-verson and the City of Lino Lakes, deprived him of his constitutional rights under color of law, and subjected him to state torts. Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment asks the Court to apply the doctrine of collateral estoppel. Defendants challenge the application of collateral estoppel, and seek summary judgment based on the doctrines of qualified and official immunity. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs motion is denied, and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ward v. OlsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Geist v. AmmaryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Olson v. City of Hooper BayAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Ickes v. Borough of BedfordDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Crowell v. KirkpatrickDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.