State v. White
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s pretrial order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop. Appellant argues that the district court incorrectly interpreted Minn. Stat. § 169.79, subd. 7, to prohibit the use of any license plate cover, and that under a correct interpretation of the statute, his license plate cover did not violate the statute so as to justify the traffic stop. Because we conclude that the district court correctly interpreted the statute, we affirm.
FACTS
Bloomington Police Officer Cullan McHarg stopped…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton EngelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009