Homer Township v. Zimney
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Homer Township appealed from a district court judgment declaring its zoning ordinance void for failure to comply with a statutory notice requirement and dismissing its action against Douglas and Lonnie Zimney to enforce the ordinance. We affirm.
The Township sued Zimneys, alleging, in part: (1) that the Township adopted a zoning ordinance on August 3,1979; (2) that in 1989, Zimneys sought a variance from the ordinance’s restrictions on commercial uses; (3) that the variance was denied and Zimneys did not appeal; and (4) that, shortly after the variance was denied,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Dodds v. BickleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Glaspey & Sons, Inc. v. ConradWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- In Interest of NyflotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Pulkrabek v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sweeney v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Devils Lake v. CorriganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- North Dakota Department of Human Services v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Ramsey County Farm Bureau v. Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Arnegard v. Arnegard TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.