Legal Opinion

Homer Township v. Zimney

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1992No. Civ. 910367PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Homer Township appealed from a district court judgment declaring its zoning ordinance void for failure to comply with a statutory notice requirement and dismissing its action against Douglas and Lonnie Zimney to enforce the ordinance. We affirm.

The Township sued Zimneys, alleging, in part: (1) that the Township adopted a zoning ordinance on August 3,1979; (2) that in 1989, Zimneys sought a variance from the ordinance’s restrictions on commercial uses; (3) that the variance was denied and Zimneys did not appeal; and (4) that, shortly after the variance was denied,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dodds v. BickleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Glaspey & Sons, Inc. v. ConradWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In Interest of NyflotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pulkrabek v. Morton CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Devils Lake v. CorriganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. North Dakota Department of Human Services v. RyanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ramsey County Farm Bureau v. Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Arnegard v. Arnegard TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API