Legal Opinion

Arnegard v. Arnegard Township

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2018No. 20170242PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Cameron and Mary Susan Arnegard appeal from a judgment relating to a conditional use permit (CUP) obtained from Arnegard Township in McKenzie County. The Arnegards argue the district court erred in granting the Township's motion in limine to exclude a buy-sell agreement; denying their motion to amend their complaint on a due process claim; granting summary judgment dismissing their breach of contract, actual fraud and equitable estoppel claims; dismissing their negligence and deceit claims by directed verdict; and determining no party prevailed in the action. The…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gerrity Bakken, LLC v. Oasis Petroleum North America LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Fettig v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Bride v. Trinity Hosp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. City of West Fargo v. McAllisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API