Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Raney

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1966No. Civ. 525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing action for failure to serve and return summons within three years, and from an order denying issuance of alias summons, a nonappealable order under Code of Civil Procedure section 963 which may be reviewed on appeal from the judgment. (Price v. Hibbs, 225 Cal.App.2d 209, 212 [37 Cal.Rptr. 270].) Section 581a of the Code of Civil Procedure requires dismissal ‘ ‘ unless the summons shall be served and return thereon made within three years after the commencement of said action, . . . provided, that ... no dismissal shall be had under this section as to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Dresser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Governale v. Bethlehem Pacific Coast Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. HerzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Wurnitsch v. NordvikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Taylor v. HizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API