Legal Opinion

Wurnitsch v. Nordvik

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1971No. Civ. 25717PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of dismissal which was entered following the granting of the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action on the grounds that it was not brought to trial within five years after it was filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.) He contends that the judgment and the order upon which it is predicated are erroneous because it was established that the defendant driver was absent from the state so as to toll the running of the statutory period. In the establishment of that predicate, he urges that the court erred in considering whether or not he could have…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Romero v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Goodwine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Bennett Cement Contractors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Griffis v. S. S. Kresge Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Ostrus v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Hirsch v. BlishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API