Legal Opinion
Preyor v. City of Ferndale
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2007No. 06-1995UnpublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
On behalf of his son (William Preyor, III), Plaintiff William Preyor Jr. brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Ferndale and several of its police officers, alleging deliberate indifference to his son’s serious medical needs. The parties stipulated to the dismissal of all Defendants except two (Sergeants Steve Jennings and Thomas Cupples). These two collectively filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, which the district court denied. They filed this interlocutory appeal; and, for the following reasons, we AFFIRM the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Edward E. Westlake v. William Lucas, Sheriff of Wayne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Samantha Burwell v. City of Lansing, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Imhoff v. TemasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Solovy v. MorabitoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Burke v. Aramark Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Dafinka Stojcevski v. Macomb County, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.