Legal Opinion
Bidwell v. Garvey
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 7, 1990No. Civ. JH-87-509, JH-87-698PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOSEPH C. HOWARD, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. (Paper Nos. 71 and 72). Oppositions, (Paper Nos. 74 and 75), and replies have been filed. (Paper Nos. 75 and 77). Judge Herbert F. Murray referred these motions to Magistrate Daniel E. Klein for a report and rec ommendation which was issued on August 31, 1989. (Paper No. 81). Subsequently the parties filed objections to the report and recommendation, (Paper Nos. 83, 84, 85, and 86), as well as replies. (Paper Nos. 88 and 89). The motions are now ripe for disposition, and this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William EngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meyer v. Berkshire Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Riley v. MurdockDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Kowalewski v. DetweilerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1991