Bowles v. Flotill Products, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
WELSH, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks treble damages for alleged violations of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 901 et seq.
Defendant made motions to (1) dismiss plaintiff’s complaint upon the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which the relief therein sought could be granted; (2) for a more definite statement of the alleged violations by defendant of the maximum prices established by the regulations referred to in said complaint, and (3) for a bill of particulars covering the alleged violations by defendant of the maximum prices established…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. McKayDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
- Commonwealth v. C. & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Bowles v. National Erie Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- United States v. Allied Chemical & Dye CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
- Walling v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowles v. SchlambergDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1946
- Bowles v. Sebastopol Berry Growers Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1945