Dunlap, R. v. Federal Signal Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY BOWES, J.:
Appellants Roger Maher and Carl Roell ("Maher and Roell") appeal from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Federal Signal Corporation ("Federal Signal"), *1068 and dismissing all remaining claims. We affirm.
Maher and Roell are members of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Fire. They are parties in a mass tort products liability action commenced by approximately 247 firefighters who allegedly suffered permanent hearing loss due to exposure to siren noise from the Q2B siren ("Q-siren") manufactured by Federal Signal. Their cases were consolidated for trial with cases filed by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sullivan, M. v. Werner CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Sullivan, M. v. Werner CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- BLOOM v. MEDICAL DEPOT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Day, P. v. Genuine Parts Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- LEHMANN v. LOUISVILLE LADDER INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.