A.L.L. v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Justice
Respectfully, I dissent. I join Chief Justice Cobb’s well written dissenting opinion, and I write separately to further explain my views.
Rules 15.2(a) and (d), Ala. R.Crim. P., divide the universe of defects in indictments into two categories: those that must be raised in a pretrial motion and those that may be raised at “any time during the pendency of the proceeding.”10 The latter *157category includes defects that involve either a “lack of subject matter jurisdiction or the failure to charge an offense.” Rule 15.2(a) (emphasis added); see also Rule 15.2(d). Because the defect in the indictment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- United States v. Carl J. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Ex Parte ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- United States v. Thomas J. PurvisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.