Legal Opinion · Dissent

A.L.L. v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 21, 2009No. 1080395Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

Respectfully, I dissent. I join Chief Justice Cobb’s well written dissenting opinion, and I write separately to further explain my views.

Rules 15.2(a) and (d), Ala. R.Crim. P., divide the universe of defects in indictments into two categories: those that must be raised in a pretrial motion and those that may be raised at “any time during the pendency of the proceeding.”10 The latter *157category includes defects that involve either a “lack of subject matter jurisdiction or the failure to charge an offense.” Rule 15.2(a) (emphasis added); see also Rule 15.2(d). Because the defect in the indictment…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Ex Parte HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. United States v. Carl J. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Ex Parte ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. United States v. Thomas J. PurvisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API