Legal Opinion
United States v. Carl J. London
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1977No. 75-3597PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question whether an indictment charging defendants with concealing or covering up by trick, scheme, or device a material fact in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 is insufficient solely because it fails to specify the precise trick, scheme or device allegedly used. 1
The district court dismissed fourteen counts of an indictment that charged the appellees, Carl and Maylon London, with concealing and covering up by trick, scheme, or device material facts in their dealings with the Farmers Home Administration. The fourteen counts identify the material…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. John K. Briggs, Robert Wayne Beverly and John C. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Eldred J. Paternostro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Erle W. McGoughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Thomas Meacham, Joseph Ward, Edward William Gilroy, Bobby Gene Hayes and Donald L. MetsgerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Thomas L. VarkonyiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Harvey I. SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.